On Wednesday, a group of fiscal watchdog organizations led by Taxpayers for Common Sense sent a letter to the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, urging them to oppose a wasteful provision in the Chairman's Mark of the Fiscal Year 2017 Appropriations Bill. The provision in question would require the U.S. Air Force to continue using coal shipped from Tamaqua, Pennsylvania to heat its military installation in Kaiserslautern, Germany (see below). Although the language was new in this year's bill, it is a resurrected version of what was the last remnant of a requirement for the military to heat its German bases with anthracite coal that dates back more than 50 years.
For this exceptionally wasteful practice, TCS awarded the provision and its defenders a Golden Fleece Award in 2015. After an amendment to the House FY16 Defense Appropriations bill sponsored by Reps. Jared Huffman (D-CA) and Tom McClintock (R-CA) passed on a wide bipartisan vote of 252-159, the measure was stripped from the bill and was not added to the FY16 Ominbus bill. To save taxpayers money, the provision should stay dead. See the full text of the letter below.
May 11, 2016
FISCAL GROUPS URGE YOU TO OPPOSE SECTION 8127 OF THE DEFENSE APPROPRIATION BILL: END THIS WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY
Dear Representative,
On behalf of our organizations and our combined memberships, we urge you to oppose a provision in the Chairman’s mark of the Fiscal Year 2017 Defense Appropriations Bill when the bill is debated in subcommittee this afternoon.
Last year’s Floor amendment by Representatives Huffman and McClintock ended a decades-long program to ship a particular grade of coal from northeastern Pennsylvania to heat several U.S. military bases in Germany. This program began, on a much larger scale, in 1961. But although its scope has narrowed over the years, the requirement still existed in the Committee’s version of the Fiscal Year 2016 bill, 54 years later.
The Huffman/McClintock amendment was put to a recorded vote on the Floor and won by a significant margin, 252 in favor and 159 opposed.
Unfortunately, the FY17 Chairman’s mark resurrects this requirement in a slightly modified form. While previous language prohibited the modernization of the heating plants at U.S. military installations in the Kaiserslautern Military Community in Germany to be fired by any fuel other than coal, the new language appears to allow the Secretary of the Air Force to modernize the heating plants, but goes on to state, “Provided, That in the City of Kaiserslautern and at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks area, such agreements shall include the use of energy sourced domestically within the United States as the base load energy for municipal district heat to the United States Defense installations.”
As you know, the use of the word “shall” ties the hands of the Pentagon. The energy source still must come from the U.S. and be shipped across the Atlantic Ocean. You may hear the argument that the coal, or other energy, must come from the U.S. or the Air Force will be forced to buy it from Russia. Don’t be fooled. Germany also produces anthracite coal.
We urge you to strip this provision from the Chairman’s mark. To do so is a vote for fiscally conservative values and against the continuation of another outdated government subsidy.
Sincerely,
Coalition to Reduce Spending
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
National Taxpayers Union
Taxpayers for Common Sense
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Letter
Fiscal Groups Urge Lawmakers to Kill the Resurrected Coal to Kaiserslautern Provision
On Wednesday, a group of fiscal watchdog organizations led by Taxpayers for Common Sense sent a letter to the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, urging them to oppose a wasteful provision in the Chairman's Mark of the Fiscal Year 2017 Appropriations Bill. The provision in question would require the U.S. Air Force to continue using coal shipped from Tamaqua, Pennsylvania to heat its military installation in Kaiserslautern, Germany (see below). Although the language was new in this year's bill, it is a resurrected version of what was the last remnant of a requirement for the military to heat its German bases with anthracite coal that dates back more than 50 years.
For this exceptionally wasteful practice, TCS awarded the provision and its defenders a Golden Fleece Award in 2015. After an amendment to the House FY16 Defense Appropriations bill sponsored by Reps. Jared Huffman (D-CA) and Tom McClintock (R-CA) passed on a wide bipartisan vote of 252-159, the measure was stripped from the bill and was not added to the FY16 Ominbus bill. To save taxpayers money, the provision should stay dead. See the full text of the letter below.
May 11, 2016
FISCAL GROUPS URGE YOU TO OPPOSE SECTION 8127 OF THE DEFENSE APPROPRIATION BILL: END THIS WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY
Dear Representative,
On behalf of our organizations and our combined memberships, we urge you to oppose a provision in the Chairman’s mark of the Fiscal Year 2017 Defense Appropriations Bill when the bill is debated in subcommittee this afternoon.
Last year’s Floor amendment by Representatives Huffman and McClintock ended a decades-long program to ship a particular grade of coal from northeastern Pennsylvania to heat several U.S. military bases in Germany. This program began, on a much larger scale, in 1961. But although its scope has narrowed over the years, the requirement still existed in the Committee’s version of the Fiscal Year 2016 bill, 54 years later.
The Huffman/McClintock amendment was put to a recorded vote on the Floor and won by a significant margin, 252 in favor and 159 opposed.
Unfortunately, the FY17 Chairman’s mark resurrects this requirement in a slightly modified form. While previous language prohibited the modernization of the heating plants at U.S. military installations in the Kaiserslautern Military Community in Germany to be fired by any fuel other than coal, the new language appears to allow the Secretary of the Air Force to modernize the heating plants, but goes on to state, “Provided, That in the City of Kaiserslautern and at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks area, such agreements shall include the use of energy sourced domestically within the United States as the base load energy for municipal district heat to the United States Defense installations.”
As you know, the use of the word “shall” ties the hands of the Pentagon. The energy source still must come from the U.S. and be shipped across the Atlantic Ocean. You may hear the argument that the coal, or other energy, must come from the U.S. or the Air Force will be forced to buy it from Russia. Don’t be fooled. Germany also produces anthracite coal.
We urge you to strip this provision from the Chairman’s mark. To do so is a vote for fiscally conservative values and against the continuation of another outdated government subsidy.
Sincerely,
Coalition to Reduce Spending
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
National Taxpayers Union
Taxpayers for Common Sense
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Share This Story!
Related Posts
Taking Advantage of Tax Day
Letter: Closing Military Bases Overseas Will Save Billions and Improve National Security
FAQ on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
The art of the hollow promise to cut Pentagon waste
Wildfire Funding in Full Year Continuing Resolution
Green Scissors Comments on 45Z Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit
Most Read
Get Social
Recent Content
Analysis
Section 199A: Boosting Business or Busting Budgets?
Letter
Letter: Closing Military Bases Overseas Will Save Billions and Improve National Security
FAQ
FAQ on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Op-Ed
The art of the hollow promise to cut Pentagon waste
Stay up to date on our work.
Sign up for our newsletter.
"*" indicates required fields