The President’s budget request proposes changes to the highly subsidized crop insurance program to rein in wasteful spending while also maintaining a strong safety net for farmers. Projected to cost nearly $8 billion annually, but spiking to as much as $14 billion in 2012, federally subsidized crop insurance is consistently the most expensive federal income entitlement available for agricultural businesses. It’s also the only federal agricultural income subsidy program with no payment limits or means-testing.

The budget request proposes nearly $26.1 billion in savings from the federally subsidized crop insurance program, slightly less than last year’s $28.6 billion, through policies that TCS has long advocated for. The budget generates $724 million in savings by limiting eligibility to receive crop insurance subsidies to agricultural businesses with less than $500,000 AGI (adjusted gross income).

This change would actually impact few businesses. In 2013, a year of record income in agriculture, less than 2.1 percent of all agricultural businesses had an AGI in excess of half a million dollars. In addition, the proposal calls for reducing the subsidies that taxpayers pay private insurance companies to manage the program ($3 billion). The bulk of the crop insurance savings comes from decreasing the taxpayer-paid portion of crop insurance premiums.

On average, taxpayers subsidizes 62 percent of the crop insurance premium while agricultural producers only pay 38 percent of the cost. The president’s budget would get this closer to an actual partnership by decreasing the average premium subsidy down to 48 percent. Specifically, the budget calls for reducing the premium subsidy for Harvest Price Option (HPO) coverage by 15 percent and reducing subsidy rates for all other coverage by 10 percentage points.

Reducing the federal taxpayer burden in the crop insurance program has been a focus of both President Trump and President Obama before him. These common sense reforms to federally subsidized crop insurance are a great step towards creating a safety net that taxpayers can afford. A number of bipartisan reform proposals have already been offered in Congress. These include HR 2332, Assisting Family Farmers through Insurance Reform Measures Act (AFFIRM) sponsored by Reps. Ron Kind (D-WI) and Sensenbrenner (R-WI), and its companion S. 1025 sponsored by Sens. Flake (R-AZ) and Shaheen (D-NH).

Crop Insurance Savings Proposed in President’s Budget Requests Savings in FY2013 Request Savings in FY2014 Request Savings in FY2015 Request Result of 2014 Farm Bill Savings in FY2016 Request Savings in FY2017 Request Savings in FY2018 Request Savings in FY2019 Request
Reduce taxpayer subsidy for private crop insurance company rate of return from 14% to industry average of 12% $1.2 billion $1.2 billion $1.2 billion Rejected Abandoned Included in 2015 Bipartisan Budget Agreement $3.038 billion. Reversed in the Transportation bill (FAST Act). -$3.038 billion Not Included $2.988 billion
Reduce crop insurance company subsidies for managing individual policies from $1.3 billion per year to $900 million $2.9 billion $2.8 billion $2.9 billion Rejected Abandoned Not included Not Included Not Included
Rescind the authority for funding a crop insurance pilot program for wild salmon Not Proposed Not Proposed $10 million Rejected Abandoned Not included Not Included Not Included
Decrease the subsidy on basic catastrophic crop insurance policies $0.255 billion $0.292 billion Not Proposed Rejected Abandoned Not included Not Included Not Included
Decrease by 3 percentage points the subsidy for buying highly subsidized crop insurance policies (was a 2% cut in FY2013 request) $3.3 billion $4.2 billion $3.8 billion Rejected Abandoned Not included No across the board cut Combined with HPO subsidy reduction
Decrease by 10 percentage points the subsidy for buying crop insurance for producers who elect greater price protection, called the Harvest Price Option (was 2% in FY14 and 4% in FY15. FY18 proposed full elimination of subsidy for HPO)* Not Proposed $3.2 billion $6.3 billion Rejected $14.6 billion $16.9 billion $11.9 billion Combined with across the board reduction
HPO subsidy reduction of 15% and across-the-board reduction (other than CAT) of 10% Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed $22.371 billion
Tighten the rules regarding payments for prevented plantings Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed Rejected $1.4 billion $1.1 billion Not Included Partially done administratively $TBD
Limit crop insurance premium subsidy to $40,000 Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed n/a Not Proposed Not Proposed $16.2 billion Not Included
Limit crop insurance eligibility to $500,000 AGI Not Proposed Not Proposed Not Proposed 15% premium subsidy reduction for AGI over $750,000 rejected in conference committee Not Proposed Not Proposed $0.420 billion $0.724 billion
Total Proposed 10-Year Savings $7.5 billion $11.8 billion $14.2 billion $0 (Increased spending by $5.722 billion) $15.999 billion $18.013 billion $28.56 billion $26.083 billion
RELATED ARTICLE
Fiscal Conservatives Oppose Increasing Government Enforced Crop Prices
Note:  *Many federally subsidized crop insurance policies recalculate insurance payouts if the price of the crop at harvest is higher than what the policy was based on when it was bought at planting. This means producers, even those with a bountiful harvest, could receive a payout because prices are higher than they anticipated at planting. Policies with price protection are more expensive than other crop insurance policies, resulting in higher subsidies, and are more likely to result in claims, leading to increased costs for taxpayers.

GO TO THE FY19 BUDGET LANDING PAGE.

Share This Story!

Related Posts