President Biden and Donald Trump this week outlined clashing visions for the future of fossil fuel production across the country, underscoring how the nation’s energy policies hinge on the outcome of the 2024 election.
On Thursday, Trump held a private dinner at his Mar-a-Lago Club and resort with about 20 oil executives from some of the country’s biggest firms, including Chevron, ExxonMobil, Continental Resources, Chesapeake Energy and Occidental Petroleum, according to a guest list reviewed by The Washington Post. The effort was largely organized by Harold Hamm, an oil billionaire and Trump donor who runs Continental Resources and has helped recruit other donors to the Trump campaign.
In recent months, Trump has also talked with energy executives about the need for fewer regulations on drilling and has asked the executives what they need to drill more oil, according to people who have heard his comments, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations.
Despite Trump’s call to “drill, baby, drill,” the United States is now pumping more crude oil than any country in history, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The trend is inconvenient for Trump as he seeks to loosen regulations on the energy industry, and for Biden as he touts his ambitious climate agenda on the campaign trail.
The rule released Friday will require oil companies to purchase bonds of $150,000 per lease on federal lands, up from $10,000. It marks the first time the bonding requirement has been updated since 1960, despite significant inflation.
For the first time in a century, fossil fuel companies will also have to pay more in royalties on the oil and gas they extract from federal lands, based on the total revenue received. Under the new rule, the minimum royalty rate the government is paid will rise to 16.67 percent from 12.5 percent of revenue. That percentage is more in line with higher rates charged by most private landowners and major oil- and gas-producing states.
The rule comes as the Biden administration readies a sweeping plan to limit future oil drilling across roughly 13 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, the nation’s largest expanse of public land. Bloomberg News first reported that the Interior Department is expected to finalize the plan — another key plank of the president’s conservation agenda — in the coming days.
Supporters say that the changes announced Friday will better compensate taxpayers for fossil fuel extraction on federal lands, and that they will prevent taxpayers from footing the bill for cleanup of abandoned oil and gas wells. After ending their drilling operations or going out of business, fossil fuel companies have walked away from thousands of wells, leaving the sites leaking greenhouse gases and toxic substances such as arsenic and benzene.
The bipartisan infrastructure law of 2021 provided a record $4.7 billion for states’ efforts to plug these “orphan” wells. But the federal funding may make only a small dent in the problem, with some experts estimating that there could be millions of undiscovered orphan wells across the country.
“There are costs of doing business, and the industry should shoulder the costs of cleanup for their operations,” said Autumn Hanna, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group. “They’re extracting oil and gas from public lands for their own profit, and those resources are owned by taxpayers, who should not be left to shoulder the cleanup costs themselves.”
Kate Groetzinger, communications manager at the Center for Western Priorities, a conservation group, said the changes are “only fair” after the country’s largest oil and gas companies reported their biggest annual profits in a decade. ExxonMobil reported $36 billion in earnings last year, while Chevron netted $21.4 billion.
“They make huge profits and then leave taxpayers holding the bag,” Groetzinger said of such firms.
Fossil fuel industry trade groups, for their part, voiced strong concerns about the BLM’s proposed rule, released last summer. In public comments, a coalition of 14 trade associations wrote that the proposal could hamper domestic fossil fuel production, making America more reliant on other countries for its energy needs.
“We are concerned that BLM’s approach with this rule overreaches its statutory authority and could have a damaging impact on U.S. energy security and the economy,” wrote the groups, including the American Petroleum Institute and the Independent Petroleum Association of America.
Dan Naatz, executive vice president of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, previously told The Post that the proposed rule would make it harder for smaller oil and gas firms to drill on public lands.
“I don’t know any company that just wants to speculate or just sit on leases,” Naatz said. “The goal is to produce.”
Friday’s rule codifies provisions in Biden’s signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act. It also directs oil companies to prioritize leasing in areas with existing energy infrastructure and high production potential, rather than areas with sensitive wildlife habitat or cultural resources. Overall, it will generate an additional $1.5 billion in revenue for the federal government and state governments through 2031, according to the Interior Department.
In addition to overhauling fossil fuel production on federal lands, the administration has sought to boost renewable-energy development on these tracts. On Thursday, the Interior Department announced that it had approved permits for nearly 29 gigawatts of clean energy — enough to power more than 12 million homes. The figure includes dozens of solar farms, wind turbines and geothermal projects.
Also on Thursday, Interior finalized a rule that will reduce the rents and fees that renewable-energy developers pay to use public lands. The rule will slash these payments by about 80 percent compared with the previous requirements in place since 2022.
Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said on a call with reporters that the Biden administration has approved more than double the number of renewable-energy projects than the Trump administration did. She suggested that Trump, who has criticized wind power as excessively costly and falsely claimed that wind turbines cause cancer, had slowed — but not stopped — the nation’s shift away from fossil fuels.
“The previous administration did everything they could to hobble our department’s clean-energy program, but we’re making up for lost time as we focus on this urgent and overdue transition to a better future,” Haaland said.
Get Social