Bioenergy2023-02-06T14:12:26-05:00

Deep Dive: Bioenergy

Taxpayers and the federal government helped launch the U.S. biofuels and biomass industries. Bioenergy subsidies, along with duplicative and counterproductive biofuels infrastructure tax credits, loan guarantees, and the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) consumption mandate, helped the industry overproduce and grow to a size that would not have been possible without taxpayer support. Bioenergy was intended to significantly reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and move the U.S. away from fossil fuels. However, in practice, federal policies and subsidies do not significantly reduce GHG emissions as once intended. Current incentives may even increase and accelerate the impacts of climate change.

Cover of Taxpayer Savings in Agriculture and Conservation Programs Fact Sheet
Cover of Understanding U.S. Corn Ethanol and Other Corn-Based Biofuels Report

Real climate solutions will involve learning lessons from past bioenergy mistakes and forgoing the continuation of status quo, special interest subsidies.

Read more:

  • Pain at the Pump: A weekly wastebasket on why instead of increasing subsidies and mandates for food-based biofuels that do more harm than good, policymakers should zero in on real climate solutions

Want to know more about Bioenergy?

We’ve been talking about this topic for a long time. Explore our deep archive of material below.

November 2024

September 2024

August 2024

Go to Top